What is the purpose of argument writing

  •  51 Comments

Print Argumentation in text One of most the fundamental things we use language for is argument. Arguing means claiming that something is true and trying to persuade other people to agree with your claim by presenting evidence to substantiate it. An argument is statement with three components: "What is the purpose of argument writing" point of view, a claim, something we are arguing in favour of The actual argument, the evidence we are using to argue with A statement that links the initial claim to the argument and ensures that we understand how the argument functions.

The statement that connects the initial claim and the argument is referred to as the warrant. The warrant is thus an argument for the connection between the initial claim and the argument. I made dinner yesterday. But does this rule apply without exception? A person who is about to sit an examination does not need to make dinner.

The speaker then adds: If so, in favour of what? The argument could go as follows: If this conversation were to continue, the next question ls probably be: It is possible to analyse this short conversation more precisely and thoroughly than we have done here. If it is not, this is not a valid argument. But this is not necessary. The point is that we are analysing the discussion when we encounter contradictory arguments.

What do the arguments support?


What is the purpose of argument writing

What are the arguments? Why are they effective? Or not very effective? Or even completely ineffective? Studying involves reading and writing argumentative texts. Your task as a student includes analysing the function of the arguments in the texts you read. At the same time you argkment learning to adopt a critical stance to the texts you are reading. What claims are contained in the text? What is the author arguing in favour of? The claim may also be referred to as the thesis statement. Sometimes the author will direct an open discussion towards a claim, which is presented at the end of the article.

The claim can therefore also be referred to as the conclusion. What arguments are contained od the text? How do the authors substantiate their claims? What link are the authors using to substantiate their arguments?

An argument that substantiates a claim is also known as evidence. What evidence do the authors have for claiming that? Why do these arguments appear to be relevant in this context? The link between an argument and a claim is sometimes called a warrant. This statement was implied, but necessary for the argument to work. In a linguistic study of the relevance of age to the learning of correct pronunciation, a possible warrant could be: What are the possible counter arguments or objections?

Do the authors take possible counterarguments into account? Do they discuss both sides of the debate before reaching a conclusion? Or do they argue one-sidedly in favour of their claim, only adducing such research and empirical evidence findings, data purpse will support their claim?

What purpose of the argument is writing are

Do the authors adequately justify their methods? If their arguments rely on data, are there enough data? Are the data what is the purpose of argument writing representative? If they base their claims on interviews, did they conduct enough interviews? Were the interviews sufficiently thorough? Or do the authors draw wider conclusions than are justified by the scope of wfiting underlying evidence?

Ask whether the use of a method is here justified, analyse if the method presented has sufficient backing. Look for this backing also referred to as foundation or support in various places. When you ask what backing there is for a claim, this is the same as asking what arguments exist in support of the claim or what evidence supports it. For each argument, ask: What is the backing for this argument?

What types of qualifiers are used by the authors when presenting the claim?

What is the purpose of argument writing

Look for qualifiers in the formulation of the argument. In that case you could say: What they are claiming is more problematic than they would lead us to believe. A thorough critique of a text must build upon a thorough reading where you present your counterarguments in a balanced manner. EXERCISE Gather the questions above and use them as a method to ask questions to the texts you are reading the method is called the Toulmin model on argumentation.

What does the author claim? Which are her arguments, and how does she document her claims? What research method is used? Are any counter arguments presented for the choice of research method? What backing does the method go here in spite of the counterarguments pointed to? How does the author qualify see more arguments in the text?

After in-depth searches to find information for your thesis, use the above argumentation model to analyse central texts. This will give you a more systematic view on how the authors builds their argumentation, whether the arguments are sufficient, and will also unveil weaknesses in the text. Argumentative texts Not all texts — or even all scholarly texts — are argumentative.

Black colleges are inferior to major state-run universities. Jesse Louis Jackson lost the bid for the Democratic Party's Presidential nomination to Michael Dukakis. Nor are we talking about the way you friend might feel about the issue. Colomb, and Read article M. Please do not use this list as a model for the format of your own reference list, as it may not match the citation style you are using. It may seem to you that no one could possibly disagree with the position you are arguing, but someone probably has. So long as this is true, then you must be conscious of the fact that your opponent may have very valid objections to your proposition. What is the purpose of argument writing about the arguments?

The primary purpose of an encyclopaedia article is to inform. It provides information about something rather than arguing in favour of a particular point of view. They argue in favour of something. Often authors will state clearly what it is that they are arguing. Here is an example from an article by a literary critic: Note the following points about this sentence: What follows is the point of view or claim that will be the subject of the argument, i.

Firstly, there will not always be a direct statement to this effect. Often we will have to work out what is being argued by analysing the text, without the direct assistance of these types of hints. Secondly, even though the authors may tell us what they link argue, this does not necessarily mean that we will understand fully what they mean.

If you have studied literary science, you may have an idea of the actual or likely meaning. But even then you should probably do some further reading in order to understand more precisely what the author check this out talking about in this context. In the example above, the author expands on the meaning of these concepts in the sentences following the one cited.

  • Take notes either in the margins of your source if you are using a photocopy or your own book or on a separate sheet as you read.
  • This type of fallacy will also involve name calling as when you accuse your opponent of being a wife beater or alcoholic rather than sticking with the issues.
  • What types of argument and evidence are they using?

This section provides even more detailed information, whag to various theoreticians, explaining additional concepts, and providing examples. Thirdly, it is not always the case that a point of view is something that must — or can — be proved. How can one prove that a particular reading of a poem is correct? The point here is rather that the author derives something from the analytical process, with her or his interpretation shedding new light on the text that is the subject of the analysis and that the discussion contains some valid points and interesting material.

In short, the decisive factor is that the reader gains new insight. Although the precise nature of this insight may be difficult to define, this does not render it worthless. Even so, when we are looking for argumentation in a text, our priorities wjat be: Fourthly, note that the claim in the example is formulated with certain qualifications. Certain expressions used to formulate the claim make it less definitive than it would be had they not been present.

The author does not say: In other words, the author is to a certain extent reserving her position.

Dare the purpose is argument writing what of solidify our

This can also be described as using qualifiers to indicate how strongly a claim should be interpreted. Instead we usually encounter such logic. The use of such qualifiers is widespread — and when reading it is important to notice how they are used.


What is the purpose of argument writing

So much for the claim standpoint, assertion, hypothesis, or whatever click being argued in favour of. What about the arguments? The arguments are everything that is put forward in support of the claim.

Newsletter

4 Comments
  1. What is the purpose of argument writing
    Maulkis 02.09.2017 in 03:55

    I am sorry, that has interfered... I here recently. But this theme is very close to me. Write in PM.

  1. What is the purpose of argument writing
    Faule 04.09.2017 in 20:15

    It is a pity, that I can not participate in discussion now. I do not own the necessary information. But with pleasure I will watch this theme.

  1. What is the purpose of argument writing
    Taum 13.09.2017 in 10:32

    It is remarkable, the useful message

  1. What is the purpose of argument writing
    Najin 18.09.2017 in 02:20

    It is very valuable information

Leave a Reply

*
*
* Minimum length: 20 characters